Saturday, April 21, 2012

Chief Business Correspondent, U.S. News and author of Rebounders: How Winners Pivot From Setback to Success
The Phony 'Gender Wars'
Posted: 04/19/2012 11:52 am

As if men and women don't already have enough to bicker about, the media is now gleefully stoking a made-up battle over who matters more: men or women?

In her new book The Richer Sex, for example, journalist Liza Mundy musters reams of data to show that women are becoming a more powerful economic force than men. Inside the covers, she points out that this trend could benefit men as well as women. Yet the provocative title suggests a winner-take-all competition between the two genders, an oversimplified meme that has set off plenty of hyperventilating in the media.

Marriage isn't cool any more, as sociologist Eric Klinenberg points out in his recent book, Going Solo. More women are forging careers and having children without a male partner, as if a dab of sperm is all they really need from men. Later this year, we'll get to debate anew whether we've really reached "the end of men," as Hanna Rosin will argue in a forthcoming book derived from a controversial 2010 story in The Atlantic. And of course Mitt Romney and Barack Obama will keep us on high gender alert with their ongoing battle over who's more hostile to women.

I'm not going to summon more mind-numbing data to refute the idea of a gender war, because on debates like this there's usually "expert" evidence supporting both sides, which leads precisely nowhere. Practically everybody ends up believing what they started out believing, because they find a factoid or a pundit to validate their view.

Instead of that, how about simply applying some common sense to the whole question. Are gender wars really a common family problem? Do families break apart and relationships falter because men are irrelevant and fail to recognize their own obsolescence? Do men and women really tussle over who is the dominant economic power?

Many of us can point to a personal anecdote or two about dropout Dads, breadwinner Moms or gender-bent household arrangements. But on the whole, what I seen happening among men and women -- Moms and Dads -- is a pragmatic and sensible effort to optimize opportunity, pool resources and achieve outcomes that are best for everybody. If there's a war, it's rather civil.

Women, for example, now earn the majority of bachelor's and advanced degrees. Plus, they tend to work in growing fields such as healthcare, whereas men are overrepresented in stagnant or shrinking fields like construction, manufacturing and middle management. That's why women are a growing economic force, as they have been for 20 years. But this is hardly a socially destructive trend. Instead, it gives many families an additional source of income and more options for getting ahead.

What happens in most families is a kind of negotiation among partners and spouses, who recognize the changing prospects of men and women in real time and make rational adjustments. If a woman can earn more than her husband, she's likely to work more than he does, while the man stays home and handles more of the household chores. It doesn't always work smoothly, but it does give a family more choices than they'd have in a rigid setup where only the man worked. In a business, that would be considered efficient allocation of resources. In a family, it's a gender revolution. Single women these days seem to represent an even more emphatic rejection of the traditional role they once played. In the new TV series Girls, twentysomething women have depersonalized sex just like men, shucking the guilt of their forbears to the foot of the bed. These, presumably, are same women who will raise kids without even expecting a man to be involved, and perhaps make it all the way to old age without ever having to rely on a man.

You go girl! Just keep in mind that in real life, it can be kind of nice to have a man around every now and then. Anybody who knows a single Mom, especially one who works, knows that the power and the glory of depending on nobody evaporates as soon as a kid gets sick, there's a call from the authorities or it suddenly seems impossible to keep up with everything that goes wrong with kids. The same goes for single Dads, who don't generate as many book titles but still represent a meaningful sliver of our fragmenting society. Everybody needs help and companionship. Sometimes, a lot.

The bottom line is that people need people. There are fewer social rules than there were a generation or two ago, which has given men and women both more freedom to find flexible arrangements that work for them. What's really going on is a lot of trial and error, as men and women experiment with new roles. Unlike a war, however, this sometimes-messy experiment is heading toward a new equilibrium that may just make everybody better off. But don't tell the pundits. It will ruin their storyline.

Follow Rick Newman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rickjnewman

Friday, April 13, 2012

Associate Editor, HuffPost Women
Female Orgasm: Experts Debate The Existence Of The Vaginal Orgasm (STUDY)
Posted: 04/11/2012 9:31 am
Does the vaginal orgasm exist? For years, scientists -- and women themselves -- have grappled with this question. According to new research published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, they do, and past studies that concluded otherwise are suspect.

Experts (Mostly) Agree: There's More Than One Type Of Orgasm
In a series of essays published, experts examine past and current data about the female orgasm. Their overarching conclusion is that the clitoral orgasm (whose existence no one seems to dispute) is a separate phenomenon from vaginal orgasm (VO). "We have plenty of evidence regarding the difference between the two main orgasms, clitoral and vaginally activated orgasm," Emmanuele Jannini, a professor of endocrinology at the University of Aquila who organized the series, told Live Science.

Not all of the contributing experts agree. French gynecologist Odile Buisson argues that the internal parts of the clitoris can't be separated from the vagina, so therefore neither can the two types of orgasm. Essentially, she believes that a vaginal orgasm is just a clitoral orgasm achieved through slightly different means. However, other researchers -- including Jannini -- make the case for a greater distinction between the two as well as the existence of other types of orgasm. (Remember those exercise-induced "coregasms" that made headlines a few weeks ago?)

One of the series' contributors, Barry Komisaruk, a professor at Rutgers University, is the man behind the now-famous video of a woman's brain during orgasm. Komisaruk and his colleagues have conducted a number of studies examining the way that women's brains respond to orgasm during masturbation using an fMRI machine. He found that different areas of the brain are activated depending on where a woman is stimulating herself. And Rutgers professor emeritus, Beverly Whipple, writes in the series that the "G-region" (since the G-spot is no longer considered to be a distinct spot) is different in each woman. "[O]rgasm in women is in the brain, it is felt in many body regions, and it can be stimulated from many body regions as well as from imagery alone," she wrote.

What This Could Mean For Women
While it's important to understand the physiological aspects of orgasm -- and to constantly challenge the research around it -- the reality is that we'll never arrive at a "how-to" for the "big O" that works for every woman. However you get there, it's different for everyone.

The kind of prescriptives we read in women's magazines all the time -- follow these 10 steps to a climax so good they'll hear you in Guam -- can obscure that fact, and cause many women more anxiety than pleasure.

Even if vaginal orgasm is more available to women than previously thought, it doesn't work for everyone, or even most women. ABC News reported that up to 75 percent of women have trouble having orgasms from vaginal penetration alone, and that 10 to 15 percent have trouble having an orgasm at all, and yet many women still feel they're doing something wrong if they can't "achieve" the ecstasy that seems to come so easily to porn stars and models in perfume ads during intercourse. A simple Google search turns up hundreds of postings on Yahoo message boards from women who feel inadequate because they can't achieve a specific type of orgasm -- or any orgasm. These posts have titles like "I can't have a vaginal orgasm...and it's affecting my relationship?" "I have never had an orgasm through penetrative sex, am I normal?" and "Is it normal that I have never had an orgasm?!?"

The new data isn't problematic in and of itself, but when women feel that they should be having a specific type of orgasm and then don't, they can end up blaming themselves for a "problem" that isn't necessarily a problem. Leonore Tiefer, Ph.D., a clinical associate professor of psychiatry at the NYU Langone Medical Center, spoke to The Huffington Post on this subject last October. "The crucial thing is not to overvalue [the orgasm] or make it sound as though it's essential for normalcy or enjoyment or intimacy or maturity or femininity," Tiefer said. "People agonize over it."

Jannini expressed the hope that women stop judging their bodies based on how they experience sexual pleasure. "A woman should have an understanding -- who is she, how is her body composed, what is the possibility of her body, but she should not be looking for something like a race, like a game, like a duty," Jannini told LiveScience. "Looking for the G-spot orgasm or the vaginal orgasm as a need, as a duty, is the best way to lose the happiness of sex." So sex should be fun, pleasurable and make you happy? Amen to that. Because at the end of the day, as long as you're enjoying yourself, who cares what body part that enjoyment comes from.

 

Dear Clarence:
I hope this letter finds you in good health. How’s school & work? By the end of this week, you should only have 2 weeks left for your Undergraduate Degree (smile); that’s really Terrific! Anyway, I couldn’t wait until your letters arrive so I’m sending my second letter with a little about me in it. I hope this will shed some light on my inner self & at the same time, help you to understand me a little better.
 
I was born 36 years ago in the Bronx at 1061 Boston Post Road; I really don’t want to remember this because at that particular time, it was very traumatic for me.  My father, who I thought was my father turned out to be my step-father, who I grew to really hate even until this day. Being a toddler at that time of my life was very frightful; because of how my step-father treated me. I remember how he would fight my mother and other times how he use to beat me.  I couldn’t have been no more than 2 or 3 years of age when my step-father beat me with a HORSE WHIP because I tried telling my mother that he’d raped me.

I remember him telling me that if I said anything to my mother; that he’d beat me with that horse whip. Back then Clarence, I didn’t know what rape was; but all I knew was that what this man was doing to me was not right. Anyway as I tried to tell my mother, my step-father yell at my mother that he didn’t do anything to me except play with me.

I remember when he said that to her; she began to cry and when she did that, he got real mad and went for that horse whip.  No matter where I tried to run my step-father swung that whip and it caught me like lightening. A few times when I was getting whipped, I would try to pretend I was dead.

The more he would beat me with that horsewhip, the more I would lie there on the floor very still and just take the stinging sharp pains of that whip. To this day I still have that scar but it has gotten a lot smaller now as I have grown.  Anyway I’m not sure when it happened but my step-father left my mother.  She was very upset; I’m not sure of why she gave me up except that maybe I was the cause of her losing my step-father; I guess I’ll never know…

Well moving on I came to my foster mother, Mrs. Mary Eubanks.  She had a beautiful house in Mt. Vernon, New York; as a matter of fact the house is still standing (smile).  My foster mother treated me like I was her own daughter and she loved me very much.  She instilled in me understanding and the knowledge of being able to stand on my own two feet.  My foster mother had 5 other children who she cared for. We all were a family that prayed and stayed together.  I remember when my foster sisters and brothers got older; their parents came and got them.  My mother was said but she still never gave up hope that they would come back; in the mean time I diverted her attention by getting good grades in school and studying real hard.
 
I don’t think I ever saw my mother cry until she found out from our family doctor, that I was pregnant.  But Clarence, my mother never got mad at me for this; but I knew I’d hurt her; but after my son was born she fell in love with him as if he was her own grandchild (smile). I was blessed to have had her in my life and she did live long enough to see my son become 4 months old.  After my foster mother died, I thought that was the end of the world; because a part of me had died with her.  But you know something Clarence?  It wasn’t the end of the world.  Because then I began realizing that even thought she’d gone on, I knew she would always be with me.

(Smile).  Back in 1980-81 I came back to Yonkers and I looked up my biological mother and sisters.  I got to know my mother again although I really loved my foster mother more.  But I did try to understand why my mother gave me up, I can’t say I agree with the way she did it; but only why she did it. My sisters and I we’re not really that close. To this day the only time my twin sister call is when she wants something. As I spoke with you on the phone, my sisters are all bigger than me; estimate weight between 200-300 lbs and that is no joke.
  
Sometimes my sisters all seem so immature (smile) I feel like I’m the older child, when in actuality I’m the youngest. My brother Gordon Williams, he was smart, (smile) he moved to San Diego, California. I really don’t remember too much about him because I haven’t seen him in a very long time. I never knew my real father except that he was born in the Virgin Islands, my grandmother, I saw once.  What I remember is that she was a very beautiful woman who thought very highly of me.  She told me I looked like my father and that she was going to write to him and tell him about me.  Unfortunately I never seen her again; so therefore I can’t say if she ever wrote to my father or not.

Anyway moving on to the present, as I said before I have a beautiful son who I Thank God for every day of my life.  He’s very active in school and with sports. He’s in the United States Junior Marine Corp. R.O.T.C., Varsity Football (He plays everything except throw the ball & run with the ball & Kick it) (Smile). He plays the Piano, dance, etc., etc.  But most of all he loves his mother and he respects me and I couldn’t ask for a better son than that.  He’s in the 12th grade now and I know by this time next year he’ll probably go away to college; but Clarence he makes me very proud to be his mother.

Well Clarence, This is just some of my Life History, some good and some bad and some I left out because it hurts too much. I pray that this will help you to understand me a little better & I hope that this has not changed your mind about wanting a long term friend, companion, lover & wife.  Clarence, you once asked me “What I wanted in a man, or what my idea of a man was?”

This much I can tell you, you could have all the money in the world but if you don’t have the love, understanding, integrity, honesty, compassion or patience, than you truly won’t be able to handle me. I could care less about any man that has money; because it doesn’t mean a thing to me.  When I fall in love, it will be for what you as a man of God have on the inside.  (True you said it was physical attraction), but I like to go beyond that physical attraction & go to the core of your inner most being, & that is your spirit. That is what I look for in a man.

Once that is achieved than I look for other characteristics that I want in a man; which include; being smart, charismatic, witty, (I love distinguished older men!) But most of all he has to be a “one Woman Man” & he has to love me for who I am & not take me for granted. Other than that, this is my specification of what I want in a man. Oh Yes! I forgot I love a man who’s very passionate & don’t mind holding hands or playing footsies under the table. I don’t want to say any more until I see what your questions are in your letter; but this is just a sample of what is yet to come.

Anyway Clarence, I would love to write more; but I think I better send this off to you before I think of something else (smile). I want to thank you again regarding Washington, D.C. I am looking forward to seeing you again; but most of all I am hoping this will be it for you and I with regards to the present, future and beyond the horizon.  So until I hear from you either through phone call or letter, I’m signing off as:

Your Sleepless In New York

              (Smile)
                  B


    

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Writer
Where Are the 'Normal' Men?
Posted: 04/ 3/2012 8:45 am
Sometimes I have a reoccurring conversation with myself. This usually takes place after a particularly disturbing date, when I'm left suspended in disbelief.

It goes something like this: Am I being too picky?I then pause, reflect briefly, and always arrive at the same conclusion: Nope.

For instance, last week I went on a date with a guy who asked me if I was clean. Like this: "Are you clean?" I had a momentary bout of worry. Organic deodorants work, don't they? Then I thought he might be inquiring about my drug history. We were in Alphabet City, after all. But I don't look like a heroin-user. I don't even have high cheekbones. Thankfully, he clarified. He meant "STD-free." Mind you, this is before the tiramisu arrived.

Speaking of drugs, I also went on a date with an enraged steroid-user who looked like Hulk Hogan. He was literally bursting out of his clothes. The buttons on his polo shirt were about to pop into my plate of scallops and I was afraid I would swallow them and that would be the end of everything, including my love life.

Then there was the guy who offered to pay me $5,000 for an act of fellatio. He said he was kidding, but it ruined the mood. That was followed by: the coke addict with the facelift, the pint-sized asexual with a penchant for eyebrow waxing, the doctor who informed me within fifteen minutes of meeting me that he had "no interest in erectile dysfunction" (he was a doctor but still!) and the megalomaniac on Weight Watchers who took me on a date to Starbucks where he nibbled on a fruit parfait and talked to me about his motorcycle collection.

Add to that the guy who wore an old, woolen beanie throughout dinner. Like he did not take it off all night and I swear it had a special odor. I am not going to blame the poor cheese plate.
And finally, there was the guy who told me he dreams of a Range Rover full of offspring (gulp) and called his mother "insufferable." Handsome as he was, I Absolutely Cannot Date a man who doesn't have a healthy relationship with his mother, can I?
So I ask myself: Am I being too picky?
Nope.

All of this does not mean I hate men. I love men. Some of them. Sometimes. Just not the ones I've been out with recently.

Because these encounters have me left me wondering: Where are the normal men? *
(I really don't mean this in a rhetorical sense. Where are they?)
This isn't about being superficial. Or about being a so-called feminist. This is about self-preservation and sanity. This is about looking to meet someone who has manners. Even if I can embrace some mild eccentricities, why would I willingly breed with a total weirdo who has no concept of how to behave with a woman?

I'll admit -- there were a few okay dates, ones that had me feeling relieved that not everyone has lost the plot, but I felt very meh about them. Meh just doesn't cut it. Once you've experienced the evasive spark, it's hard to shack up with someone you feel humdrum about. I guess a meh guy to me is akin to Mr. Good Enough. But I don't want to feel meh about my lifetime partner. Does anyone?

And frankly, this is all very disheartening for me, too. Because I met some of these men through friends, so it's not like I picked them up off the street. If this is what New York women have had to put up with all this time, no wonder they complain about it!

You see, no matter what the media is spewing at us about settling for whoever or whatever if we want to have kids, it's still important to have standards. Most of us would rather be alone than be with someone who freaks us out, has a psychological disorder or fails to inspire us in any way. It is hard to argue with that.

And although I am happy for that recent wave of women who have declared they are content to be single forever, it's just honestly not what I want for myself. Because I know myself. I just won't be. I will always feel like something is missing.
There, I said it.

Granted, my upbringing probably has something to do with my unwillingness to give up on love. My parents are still in love, so I know it exists (and can last, provided you choose the right companion). When I was little, I was repeatedly told that I "would marry a prince." This was followed by a teenage-hood spent devouring romcoms. I now realize a lot of women grew up with these fairytales, and it's hard for us to shake off the idea that we deserve someone respectful and thoughtful, someone with self-control and good grooming. And frankly, why would we want to? I would argue it's just as hard to shake that off as it is for a person who grew up in a religious household to shake off their religious beliefs. It becomes sort of engrained in your psyche, and no matter how much you tell yourself God doesn't actually exist or that Prince William is now off the market, it's hard to really believe it. Beneath the dating despair, a smidgeon of hope endures.

But even if you toss the prince fantasy aside (sigh) and simply look for a kind, intelligent person with a decent sense of humor who was "raised well" (and is attractive on some level), it's still hard to find him, unattached, at least in a big city like New York. And I'm not enough of a shark to circle around the eligible men, waiting for them to become single. Maybe this is what strategic women do, but it's not my style.

Besides, I don't care about money -- that stuff comes and goes -- but I would like someone who automatically walks on the outside of the sidewalk, in case a New York taxicab should fly over the curb and graze one of us (yes, someone who's willing to take a grazing for me). Or a man who puts his hand on the small of my back as he opens the door to a restaurant, and guides me in, like Cary Grant would do. I know where the door is, but shouldn't it be him catching swine flu, not me? Is that so horribly twentieth century of me to want these basic things?
If so, who cares!

I like it, and I want it. And I don't want to settle for anything less. Why should I, or should any woman, for that matter?

This is not about desperation. It's about intent. It's about knowing what you want and recognizing what's not going to cut it.

And I sure as hell ain't gonna settle for the dregs. So men, when I say "No Weirdos Please," I just want to tell you now, once and for all, I kind of really mean it.

* By normal, I mean a well-adjusted individual with a grasp of social etiquette who has very little in common with your average psychopath.

Senior Advisor and Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement

Securing Equal Pay? There (Should Be) an App for That!
Posted: 02/ 6/2012 3:49 pm

"An economy built to last is one where we encourage the talent and ingenuity of every person in this country. That means women should earn equal pay for equal work. "

-- President Barack Obama, 2012 State of the Union Address
Last week, the Obama Administration launched the Equal Pay App Challenge. We're inviting software developers to help women ensure that they're being paid fairly -- which in turn will help restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same rules.

Right now, if you're a woman in the workforce, it can be surprisingly difficult to answer basic questions about equal pay: what's the typical salary for someone in your position? Should you be asking for more at the negotiating table? What are your fundamental legal rights?

When the Equal Pay App Challenge is over, you'll have information that helps you answer these questions, available right on your smartphone or computer. We believe that the same types of innovations that help you find movie times or get a great deal at a restaurant can help you protect your rights in the workforce.

The App Challenge is just the latest in a series of steps the Obama Administration has taken to secure a woman's right to equal pay for equal work. From the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the very first bill President Obama signed into law, to the creation of the National Equal Pay Task Force, to his continued support of the Paycheck Fairness Act, the President has helped address a gender pay gap that remains far too high.

He has taken these steps because he knows that they help all Americans -- both women and men. Today, mothers are the primary- or co-breadwinners in over two-thirds of American families. When women earn only 77 cents for every dollar men earn, as they do today, entire families suffer.

But the opposite is also true. When women have a fair shot to see their hard work pay off, families benefit. When women succeed, America succeeds.

President Obama envisions an America where his daughters are never limited by their gender. That vision is not yet a reality, and we still have a long way to go. But if we work together -- and we invite America's most creative innovators to join us in tackling this challenge -- then I am confident that we will get there.

Restaurant Workers Target Diners In Living Wage Campaign

WASHINGTON -- It's been a busy few months at Restaurant Opportunities Centers United, a scrappy non-profit that advocates for low-wage restaurant workers. To be more exact, it's been a busy few months trying to shame -- and, in less visible cases, praise -- some of the country's most prominent restaurants.

The New York-based organization released a Zagat-style "Diner's Guide" to the nation's restaurants last fall. But rather than critique the beef carpaccio or lamb rib chops, the guide details working conditions, listing whether workers receive decent pre-tip wages or sick days. Longhorn Steakhouse, among others, received a frowny-face rating, which the group says denotes "alleged illegal practices."

Then, late last month, workers affiliated with the group filed a federal lawsuit against The Capital Grille, accusing the restaurant chain of relegating minority employees to less desirable jobs and shorting workers on wages in New York, Chicago and Washington, D.C. The lawsuit is part of a broader campaign launched by Restaurant Opportunities Centers United against The Capital Grille's parent owner, Darden Restaurants, whose holdings include Olive Garden, Red Lobster and Longhorn Steakhouse.

Restaurant Opportunities Centers United's "Dignity at Darden" campaign accuses the company and its managers of paying "poverty wages," denying employees paid sick days and requiring them to work during breaks. On a website that all but wags a finger in Darden's face, the group urges the company to "have the courage to be a real leader and lift up industry standards." A Darden spokesman denied the charges, adding that Darden management reached out to the group about specific allegations before the lawsuit was filed, only to be rebuffed.

Restaurant Opportunities Centers United "doesn’t seem to be interested in the facts," said Rich Jeffers, a Darden spokesman. "We believe all the allegations are baseless." Darden employs 180,000 people, and roughly 30 percent of its managers are minorities and 41 percent are women, according to Jeffers.

Saru Jayaraman, a co-founder of Restaurant Opportunities Center United, said she stands by the lawsuit and the campaign against Darden. She was quick to add that the problems her group alleges aren't unique to that company.

"It has to do with the industry culture and a lobby that Darden is a big part of, that fights to keep the minimum wage low in an industry of occupational segregation," Jayaraman argued. "Darden is a part of it."

Top of Form
Bottom of Form
As for the negative publicity her group has been foisting on some restaurants, Jayaraman said it's mostly about raising awareness among consumers rather than employers or workers. The group's members, taking a cue from successful PR campaigns by environmental groups, seem to believe that the best way to change the employment practices inside restaurants is to involve diners. "The larger campaign is to engage consumers in changing the restaurant industry," Jayaraman said. "Ten years ago, consumers were asking restaurants, 'Is this sustainable food? Is this organically grown?' And the restaurant industry responded. I think the more that consumers ask and require and discuss with restaurants -- What's your lowest paid wage? Do you provide sick days? -- the more they’ll see they need to get ahead of the trend."

The first branch of Restaurant Opportunities Center United was founded after the Sept. 11 attacks to support displaced World Trade Center restaurant workers. The group now has branches in eight cities and includes 8,000 workers, having attracted restaurant employees like Kristin Vieira, a former New York server who's named in the lawsuit against The Capital Grille. "For a server, the money is definitely great, but at a certain point it's not worth the money anymore," Vieira said. "We just felt like they weren’t going to listen to us, and we feel like it could be a great place to work."

Among Restaurant Opportunities Center United's pet issues are the tipped minimum wage and paid sick days. The minimum wage for servers and other workers who receive tips is lower than the normal minimum wage in most states. The current tipped federal rate is $2.13 per hour -- compared with $7.25 for other workers -- although the restaurant is obliged to make up the difference if a server doesn't reach the normal minimum wage after tips. The group has found an ally in Rep. Donna Edwards (D-Md.), who introduced legislation last year that would raise the federal tipped rate.

The National Restaurant Association has been less enthusiastic about the group's campaigns, particularly the diner's guide. "ROC’s purported dining guide is a transparent attempt to disparage many of America’s restaurants, an industry which provides opportunities for millions of Americans to move up the ladder and succeed," Sue Hensley, the group's senior vice president for public affairs, said in a statement. "ROC 'reports' are opinion surveys and not an empirical analysis of the facts.... Even in a challenging economy, the restaurant industry has continued to be one of the country’s leading job creators, and for thousands of individuals -- from all backgrounds -- these jobs lead to management and ownership opportunities."

By winning, say, paid sick days for some workers, Restaurant Opportunities Center United's campaign wouldn’t be the first time public pressure changed workplace policy within the food supply chain. Earlier this month, Trader Joe's signed a "fair food agreement" with the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, a worker advocacy group of mostly immigrant workers who pick tomatoes and other crops in Florida. Trader Joe's had long resisted signing the agreement, but caved after months of protests outside stores. Taco Bell and McDonald's, among others, had already signed the agreement, which requires grocers and restaurants to pay a penny more per pound of tomatoes to help provide better working conditions for pickers.

Worker groups typically encounter strong pushback on these issues from industry lobbies, which often claim that higher wages or paid sick days will raise costs and kill jobs. The restaurant industry in Florida, for instance, is now trying to have the minimum wage for servers lowered there. And the National Restaurant Association poured more than $100,000 into a successful effort to stymie a ballot initiative for paid sick days in Denver.

According to Jayaraman, many of the diners she meets are surprised to learn that the minimum wage for servers is as low as it is, or that some workers can't take a day off when they're sick without losing a day's pay. "It’s a pervasive argument of the industry, that these are transient jobs and therefore it's OK that people get paid little," Jayaraman said. "We talk to consumers everywhere we go. There's a lack of education. When they find out a large company doesn’t provide paid sick days or pays as little as $2.13, the consumers are outraged."

Of course, plenty of restaurants do offer their workers paid sick days, and plenty also pay more than the bare-legal minimum before tips. Restaurant Opportunities Center United has been trying to draw attention to these eateries, calling them out in their guide as "high-road restaurants." Among them is La Palapa, a casual Mexican joint in New York City whose owner, Barbara Sibley, said she empathizes with the servers, bussers and dishwashers who work for her.

"Restaurant work is hard," Sibley said. "But running a restaurant right is profitable. If I can run a restaurant right and profit, then anyone can."



Ann Romney Wouldn't Find Free-Market Health Care Without Mitt Romney's Millions
Posted: 04/ 6/2012 1:11 am Updated: 04/ 6/2012 3:41 pm
Like Ann Romney, Kelly Gaeckle, pictured with her husband Peter and their four children, has multiple sclerosis. Unlike Ann Romney, she's not married to a multimillionaire.

If Ann Romney weren't wealthy, she might have even more in common with Kelly Gaeckle.
Both women suffer from multiple sclerosis, a chronic neurological disorder that impairs motor function, cognitive abilities and vision and can cause uncontrollable muscle spasms, fatigue and dizziness. Patients eventually can lose the ability to walk.

Romney, whose husband is Mitt Romney -- the leading Republican presidential contender, the ex-governor of Massachusetts and a former corporate honcho worth as much as $250 million -- presumably doesn't struggle to pay for her treatments, even if she doesn't consider herself wealthy.

Romney, who turns 63 later this month and also has a history of breast cancer, would likely be in dire straits if she had to turn to the open market for health insurance -- without her husband's millions.
"Ann Romney would literally be unable to get health insurance in most states in America and if she could get it, she'd pay an unbelievable price," said Jonathan Gruber, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. And it probably wouldn't cover treatments for M.S. and cancer, he said. Gruber helped develop both the Massachusetts health reform law signed by then-Gov. Mitt Romney in 2006 and the national law enacted by President Barack Obama two years ago.

Kelly Gaeckle, a 35-year-old stay-at-home mother and a part-time fitness instructor who lives in Santa Cruz, Calif., is lucky enough to have a high-cost insurance plan, but it doesn't cover many of the medications she needs. She and her husband, who runs his own business, struggle to pay the $1,500 monthly premium on their plan, which covers the couple and their four kids. They put just about enough money into a health savings account every year to cover the plan's high $6,500 deductible, but the funds run out quickly. After they meet the deductible and their out-of-pocket expenses hit $6,000, the insurance pays practically the full cost of their medical treatments -- but only those that are actually covered. The couple worries that its insurer will raise rates to something completely out of reach, a perfectly legal move under California law.
"I am 100 percent certain that if we lost our health insurance we would lose our house. At this point we are living month to month," Gaeckle's husband Peter wrote in an e-mail. The family budget is squeezed because of a rough patch in his business; access to health care services for themselves and their four children, two of whom have heart conditions, is a pressing concern. According to the most recent data available from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, the direct medical costs of treating M.S. were as high as $27,000 a year for an individual in 2007.

As the country waits to hear the Supreme Court's decision on health care reform, a look at the Gaeckles' health insurance offers a glimpse of what free-market health care means to those who are not receiving coverage through a company's health-care plan or lucky enough to live in Massachusetts. Reforms that former governor Romney put in place in the state would cover Gaeckle at a much lower rate than she currently pays. Much like the national health care law now before the high court, the Massachusetts law mandates that insurance companies cover everyone, sets limits on how much more they can charge people with pre-existing conditions, provides financial assistance for low- and middle-income people, and requires nearly everyone to get coverage.

Gaeckle tried a drug called Copaxone a few years ago but the side effects and the $2,600 monthly cost of the medicine, which the family had to put on its credit card, were more than she could bear. She also has avoided another M.S. drug, Avonex, because of the expense, and she puts off MRIs and other tests until later in the year when her insurance picks up the cost. Still, she's happy to have any coverage. "M.S. is very unpredictable," said Gaeckle. "I could be okay and functioning right now, but you know tomorrow could be different so I definitely feel better knowing if I can get into the doctor."

Insurance companies in California aren't allowed to kick you off a plan if you already have insurance, but state law allows health insurance companies to raise rates on expensive customers, which can price them out of coverage, said Anthony Wright, the executive director of Health Access, an advocacy group in the state. "We in California are the wild, wild west for health insurance," he said. California law also lets insurers deny applicants or provide them with a plan that doesn't cover their pre-existing conditions, Wright said. A family like the Gaeckles would have a hard time on the open market if they were to find themselves without coverage, he said.

Access to stable, reliable insurance varies for people with pre-existing conditions if they don't get it through work or a government program like Medicare or Medicaid. Some states require insurance companies to provide plans to people with pre-existing conditions but premiums can become unaffordable. Other states allow insurers to reject customers they believe would be too costly, or even decline to renew their policies after they receive diagnoses of ailments like cancer and M.S. Insurance companies also can offer plans to sick people that cover everything except their pre-existing conditions.
Starting in 2014 when the biggest parts of Obama's health overhaul take effect, people with pre-existing conditions will have access to coverage like what's available in Massachusetts.


Mitt Romney's health care proposals would reinforce the current patchwork of state regulations, don't require insurance companies to offer plans to everyone and don't limit how much they can charge based on people's medical histories
.
During a recent appearance on "The Tonight Show," Mitt Romney told host Jay Leno that he wanted to guarantee access to insurance for people with pre-existing conditions, but only if they're already covered. He didn't explain how he would help people who are uninsured because of their medical histories.
A Romney campaign spokeswoman didn't respond to three e-mails containing written questions about his national health care proposals or what kind of insurance he and his wife have.